Fundamentação da metafísica dos costumes has ratings and reviews. The Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals or Groundwork of the. Immanuel Kant – A metafisica dos costumes. Almeida Neto. Uploaded by. Almeida Neto. Loading Preview. Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can . FUNDAMENTAÇÃO DA METAFÍSICA DOS COSTUMES – CRÍTICA DA RAZÃO PRÁTICA by KANT, Immanuel and a great selection of similar Used, New and.
|Published (Last):||2 March 2015|
|PDF File Size:||17.18 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.34 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
KANT, I. A Metafisica Dos Costumes
Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page.
A metafísica dos costumes – Immanuel Kant – Google Books
The Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals or Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der SittenImmanuel Kant’s 1st contribution to moral philosophy, argues for an a priori basis for morality. However, the latter work is much less read than the Groundwork. The Groundwork is notable for its explanation of the categorical imperative, which is the central concept of his moral philosophy.
The Groundwork is broken into a preface, followed by three sections. Kant’s argument works from common reason up to the supreme unconditional law, in order to identify its existence. It’s partly because of this he decided to publish the Critique of Practical Reason in Published by Porto Editora first published To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. I would like to read the translated book of Kant about ethics but I do not know how to access it please help me.
Katherine Hi Grant, you can find it on http: Lists with This Book. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Was awful, unclear, and generally the worst MLP fanfic I’ve ever read.
The book is a complete failure from the start, because Kant attempts to explain morals from a purely reason standpoint, and makes the faulty assumption that reason, like morals, is self evident, and the reason test is all is needed to proclaim what is universally moral. Here’s the problem, if reason dictates that some races are more inferior than others, then the Holocaust is morally acceptable. Like I said, the book is a complete failure from the start, because it starts from a faulty assumptio The book is a complete failure from the start, because Kant attempts to explain morals from a purely reason standpoint, and makes the faulty assumption that reason, like morals, is self evident, and the reason test is all is needed to proclaim what is universally moral.
Like I said, the book is a complete failure from the start, because it starts from a faulty assumption. Feb 11, C. Kant’s language is consistently abstruse.
That’s about all you can say for his “prose style. The idea that humans can have any idea of right and wrong independent of God’s revelation is ludicrous; that Kant thinks he can establish such an idea by himself is absurd.
The one thing I can say for this little tract: That’s not really a point in Kant’s favor, either; just proof that his quest was foolish, and his writing less than clear.
It’s just depressing how many times i find this callous philosophy interjecting and subjegating my life.
Fundamentação da metafísica dos costumes
To me Kant is the first point of demarcation i can tangibly acknowlege as the beinging of the decline of western civilization. Feel free to disagree. I strongly believe less people should read this drivel. View all 4 comments.
Very boring and I disagree with most of which was wrote. When the author himself says his material is pointless, it must really be pointless.
Boy, Kant must’ve dod awful at parties.
Or just conversation in general. Or maybe he’d actually be really entertaining, since his communication style is just not meant to kaant understandable? Of course, one can blame the translation, but my feeling as I dredged through this book is that there’s an absolute lack of understanding of how to present ideas. Overly complex language in long sentences mixing concepts at will.
Fundamentação da metafísica dos costumes by Immanuel Kant (1 star ratings)
kang And then, the concepts themselves The book strays so far from reality that it’s Boy, Kant must’ve been awful at parties. The book strays so far from reality that it’s hard dow keep track. Maybe I’m just not cut out for philosophy. But the author seeks to prove countless times concepts in a purely theoretical manner, which leads into proving nothing but rather watching a rather long cafe monologue.
He wants to determine how a “pure will” should behave and thus comes with the definition of the famous categorical imperative. But as this “pure will” surely doesn’t exist and nothing in between is really explored, we’re left with little of interest.
And so on, and so on.
This one nearly destroyed me. At some point I gave up trying to understand and just read words until I was done. From what I could gather, Kant thinks the only truly moral act is one in which the actor has no experience of reward nor any personal inclination to perform the act. It seems to me such an idealistic view as to be completely useless since there can be no act that ever passes muster.
Kant is the Nostradamus of philosophy. Many claim that Kant’s works are filled with insights. Actually, Kant’s works are nothing more than the products of a deranged mind. I have heard bums spew incomprehensible nonsense similar to the abstruse and ambiguous writings of Kant. Although “there is always some reason in madness,” there is very little reason to be found in Kant’s madness.
The professional and arm-chair “philosophers” who extol the brilliance of Kant are fools. Yes Kant was a bad writer- horrible even. But I gave this one star because I personally do not agree with a few of his key philosophical points other people do though. Matthew rated it did not like it Apr 15, Hoyadaisy costumss it did not like it Jun 09, Courtney rated it did not like it Oct 15, Kelsey Sack rated it did not like it Feb 03, Asha rated it did not like it Aug 27, Lindsey rated it did not like it May 13, Swapna Bhasker rated it did not like it Feb 16, Rachel Vasser rated it xostumes not like it Jan 10, Anna rated it did not like it Jan 23, Nika rated it megafisica not like it Apr 23, There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
His most important work is The Metxfisica of Pure Reasonan investigation of reason itself. Pursuing metaphysics involves asking questions about the ultimate nature of reality.
Kant suggested that metaphysics can be kany thru epistemology. He asked if an object can be known to have certain properties prior to the experience of that object. He concluded that all objects that the mind can think about must conform to its manner of thought. Therefore if the mind can think only in terms of causality—which he concluded that it does—then we can know prior to experiencing them that all objects we experience must either be a cause or an effect.
So the grand questions of speculative metaphysics are off limits, but the sciences are firmly grounded in laws of the mind. The empiricists believed that knowledge is acquired thru experience metacisica, but the rationalists maintained that such knowledge is open to Cartesian doubt and that reason alone provides us with knowledge. Kant argues, however, that using reason without applying it to experience will only lead to illusions, while experience will be purely subjective without first being subsumed under pure reason.
The philosophers Fichte, Schelling, Mrtafisica and Schopenhauer saw themselves as correcting and expanding Kant’s system, thus bringing about various forms of German Idealism. Kant continues to be a major influence on philosophy to this day, influencing both Analytic and Continental philosophy. Metafizica by Immanuel Kant.
Trivia About Groundwork of the No trivia or quizzes yet. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.