In Bruno Latour & Peter Weibel (eds.) Van Realpolitik naar Dingpolitik. Between Fundamental Opposition and Realpolitik: Perspectives for an Alternative. Van Realpolitik naar Dingpolitik. B. Latour · Krisis () Bruno Latour – – In Bruno Latour & Peter Weibel (eds.), Making Things Public. By the German neologism Dingpolitik, we wish to designate a risky and tentative set of experiments in probing just what it could mean for.
|Published (Last):||7 October 2018|
|PDF File Size:||1.51 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.18 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This article has no associated abstract. The point to make is that objects trigger the connections of public, or at least shared, issues.
Here Latour ends by providing a set of guidelines if you will, or parameters for success of dingpolitik, summed up in my own interpretation: No categories specified categorize this paper. Between Fundamental Opposition and Realpolitik: What change does it make in the way people make up their minds to be attached to things? The Origin of Dnigpolitik Liberty in Confucianism: Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy.
Dingpolitik and an internet of things
Atmospheres of Democracy, Cambridge: Van Realpolitik naar Dingpolitik. This page was last modified on 24 Novemberat Find it on Scholar. Science Logic and Mathematics. Lator further discussing the political Western history, the next and important point to make is that of the shift from politics of time to politics of space.
While one might claim that the actors in this setting are the human beings organizing this assembly, Latour claims that the influence of things have an even role in creating this assembly.
Latour blames this on the dichotomy in the explanation of the word representation. Is there something lattour a matter-of-fact?
B. Latour, Van Realpolitik naar Dingpolitik – PhilPapers
In this article, politics and public space are discussed, where the claim is made that perhaps we need a shift towards the politics of things in order to re-map politics. This page has been accessed 5, times. How are all involved parties, people and things assembled? Beres – – American Journal of Jurisprudence 33 1: Taking these things back into the design loop is one of my missions, with the statement in mind that the way content is created and consumed has at least as much importance as the technology driving it.
Dante and Francesca da Rimini: The relevancy of performing research into the topic of an Internet of Things lies in the fact that, although seemingly the concept has faded into the background, reality might be catching up. Sungmoon Kim – – History of Political Thought 29 3: With a whole set of point made, the question of how Dingpolitik can take shape now remains.
From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik – An Introduction to Making Things Public |
Where this has up to now never been looked into as being political, objects are. Views Read View source View history.
The Gulf War, Postmodernism and Realpolitik. Because all representation involves re presentation. He seems to be saying that openness is a prerequisite to Actor-Network Theory. This article has no associated realpolifik. In the second, it is the re-presentation of the object in relation to those who observe it science, technology. Teodolinda Barolini – – Speculum 75 1: It is time to go back to things. In the first case, something is represented in a right way when the procedures around the representation are correct law and political science.
The Origin of Political Liberty in Confucianism: The “End of Ideology” Revisited: While always describing the how, and the procedures around the issue, when it comes down to what the issue is, political philosophy has remained silent throughout history. The concept of Realpolitik has shifted since the days of Bismarck. Can There Be Global Justice? Dingpolitik and an internet of things By: realpolitok